ArticlePublic health action2026
Enhancing parenteral therapy for anaemia among pregnant women in rural India.
Article in Public health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingPrimary care settings in a rural district of Telangana, India, under an anaemia control programme.
objectiveTo explore the facilitators and barriers to parenteral iron therapy for moderate and severe anaemia, and possible solutions from the perspective of health care providers and pregnant women.
designA qualitative descriptive study. Twenty in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions were conducted with health care providers (primary care and district hospital) and postnatal mothers who had moderate or severe anaemia. Manual content analysis with inductive coding was done to identify themes and sub-themes.
resultsFacilitators included availability of IV iron at higher-level facilities, support from ASHAs (community health volunteers), community nutrition schemes, and growing access to digital health information. Barriers clustered around medicine stock-outs at lower-level facilities, transport difficulties, out-of-pocket costs, wage loss, need for escorts to hospitals, and strong fears and misconceptions about injections. Suggested solutions focused on uninterrupted IV iron supply, decentralised service delivery, capacity-building of frontline workers, digital and community-led communication strategies, and social support mechanisms.
conclusionStrengthening supply chains, decentralising parenteral iron therapy, and enhancing culturally sensitive counselling and community support are essential to improve uptake and completion of parenteral therapy in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.