ArticlePublic health action2026
Assessing morbidity management and disability prevention for lymphatic filariasis in India.
Article in Public health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on the implementation of morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP) remains limited in India.
objectivesTo assess characteristics of persons with lymphatic filariasis (PwLF) registered for MMDP services from 2023 to 2025 and factors associated with regular receipt of services, the quality of MMDP services at designated health facilities, and barriers and facilitators to MMDP services in Gorakhpur district. METHODOLOGY: An explanatory mixed-methods study. The quantitative component involved cohort review of routine programme data from 16 public health facilities and cross-sectional quality assessment of 10 health facilities using WHO Direct Inspection Protocol. The qualitative component involved interviews and focus group discussions with beneficiaries, programme staff, and frontline workers.
resultsOut of the 946 registered PwLF, 811 were eligible to receive annual MMDP services, of which only 172 (21.4%) regularly received it. Patients with stage III or higher lymphoedema were twice as likely to regularly receive the annual services. All facilities assessed provided either suboptimal or poor-quality services, with gaps in availability of guidelines, supplies, and staff knowledge. Key barriers included supply interruptions, stigma, travel costs, and staff workload while community health workers facilitated follow-up.
conclusionMMDP services continuity and quality remain suboptimal, requiring strengthened supply chains, provider capacity, and community-based follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.