ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
Polysomnographic Sleep in Idiopathic Nightmares: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study conducted a systematic evaluation of polysomnographic differences between individuals with nightmares and healthy controls. Methods: Electronic searches of All EBM databases, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE identified 14 eligible case-control studies; seven studies involving 112 individuals with nightmares and 112 controls were included in meta-analysis. Results: The meta-analysis of sleep macro-architecture (such as total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep stage percentages) revealed no significant differences between individuals with nightmares and healthy controls. Furthermore, the limited available data regarding sleep micro-architecture (cyclic alternating patterns (CAP) and power spectral analysis (PSA)) and autonomic measures (heart rate and heart rate variability) in studies not subjected to meta-analysis makes it difficult to draw confident conclusions. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in sleep macro-architecture. This finding highlights the importance of investigating sleep micro-architecture (such as CAP and PSA), which may be relevant to the physiology of nightmares. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in future studies because of the limited available data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.