ArticleMedComm2026
Integrative Multiomics Profiling Reveals Immune Determinants of Response to Disitamab Vedotin Plus Penpulimab in HER2-Low Breast Cancer.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective single-arm study evaluated neoadjuvant disitamab vedotin plus penpulimab in Stage II-III HER2-low breast cancer (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+, fluorescence in situ hybridization-negative), a population lacking targeted neoadjuvant options. Twenty patients received the combination every 3 weeks for six cycles before surgery. In the intention-to-treat population, the pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20.0% (four out of 20; 95% CI, 5.7-43.7%), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 45.0% (nine out of 20; 95% CI, 23.1-68.5%). Among 16 patients who completed protocol-defined treatment and surgery, pCR was 25.0% (four out of 16; 95% CI, 7.3-52.4%), ORR was 56.3% (nine out of 16; 95% CI, 29.9-80.2%), and 31.3% achieved residual cancer burden Class 0-1. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 25.0%; no treatment-related deaths occurred. pCR-associated tumors had a pretreatment immune-active microenvironment enriched in inflammatory proteins, transcripts, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, whereas nonresponders displayed a higher M2/M1 macrophage ratio. An exploratory baseline score combining CCL19 and the M2/M1 ratio showed pCR/non-pCR separation (AUC = 0.8889) but attenuated on internal validation (LOOCV AUC = 0.6667, optimism-corrected bootstrap AUC = 0.8375). This combination showed preliminary antitumor activity with manageable safety; however, given the small sample size and wide confidence intervals, these findings preclude definitive conclusions about efficacy and warrant validation in larger randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.