Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830862›Full record

ArticleMedComm2026

Integrative Multiomics Profiling Reveals Immune Determinants of Response to Disitamab Vedotin Plus Penpulimab in HER2-Low Breast Cancer.

Xiaoxiao Liu, Yuting Song, Lei Liu, Aaron Qi Zhang, Xin Xie, Bing Wei, Ping He, Chunying Zhuang, Juanjuan Li, Xi Yan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xiaoxiao Liu *Institute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Yuting Song *Institute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Lei Liu *Department of Physiology School of Basic Medicine and Life Sciences Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou Jiangsu China.
Aaron Qi Zhang *Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Xin Xie *Department of Radiation Oncology Cancer Center Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Cancer Institute Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou Jiangsu China.
Bing WeiDepartment of Pathology West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Ping HeInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Chunying ZhuangInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Juanjuan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology Cancer Center Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Cancer Institute Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou Jiangsu China.
Xi YanInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Tinglun TianInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Xiaorong ZhongInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Jie ChenDivision of Breast Surgery Department of General Surgery West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Yan ChengInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Dan ZhengInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.
Shibao LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou Jiangsu China.
Hao WangHepatobiliary Center of The First Affiliated Hospital Research Unit of Liver Transplantation and Transplant Immunology Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Jiangsu China.
Ting LuoInstitute of Breast Health Medicine Sichuan Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Diseases Breast Center Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Center West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective single-arm study evaluated neoadjuvant disitamab vedotin plus penpulimab in Stage II-III HER2-low breast cancer (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+, fluorescence in situ hybridization-negative), a population lacking targeted neoadjuvant options. Twenty patients received the combination every 3 weeks for six cycles before surgery. In the intention-to-treat population, the pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20.0% (four out of 20; 95% CI, 5.7-43.7%), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 45.0% (nine out of 20; 95% CI, 23.1-68.5%). Among 16 patients who completed protocol-defined treatment and surgery, pCR was 25.0% (four out of 16; 95% CI, 7.3-52.4%), ORR was 56.3% (nine out of 16; 95% CI, 29.9-80.2%), and 31.3% achieved residual cancer burden Class 0-1. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 25.0%; no treatment-related deaths occurred. pCR-associated tumors had a pretreatment immune-active microenvironment enriched in inflammatory proteins, transcripts, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, whereas nonresponders displayed a higher M2/M1 macrophage ratio. An exploratory baseline score combining CCL19 and the M2/M1 ratio showed pCR/non-pCR separation (AUC = 0.8889) but attenuated on internal validation (LOOCV AUC = 0.6667, optimism-corrected bootstrap AUC = 0.8375). This combination showed preliminary antitumor activity with manageable safety; however, given the small sample size and wide confidence intervals, these findings preclude definitive conclusions about efficacy and warrant validation in larger randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

biomarkerdisitamab vedotinHER2‐low breast cancerneoadjuvant therapypathologic complete responsepenpulimab

Identifiers

PMID42830862
PMCPMC13634177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.