ArticleResuscitation plus2026
It takes two: development of simulation training for two-handed neonatal mask ventilation integrating a respiratory function monitor; a non-randomised before-and-after simulation study.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Facemask leak is common with a one-handed hold and can reduce the efficacy of neonatal resuscitation. Our objective was to assess a standardised, respiratory function monitor (RFM)-guided training intervention for two-handed neonatal positive pressure ventilation (PPV). Methods: Development of a two-handed PPV training algorithm occurred through an iterative process with learner and expert feedback. Participants performed PPV via a facemask on a term manikin with feedback from the RFM display (Monivent Neo100). We first piloted the training intervention on ten clinicians over six sessions. The intervention was then assessed through a before-and-after, non-randomised simulation-based study, blinded to the RFM, comparing mask leak, tidal volume and participant feedback. Mask hold style and hand preference were recorded. Results: Prior to the intervention, 17/40 (42%) had previously used two-handed PPV in clinical practice. Forty clinicians were included in the training study. Mask leak was significantly lower with a two-handed hold before training: one-handed median 27%, (IQR 3-73%) vs two-handed: 2.5% (1-31%), Conclusion: Effective facemask ventilation in a neonatal manikin was associated with a two-handed hold without training or prior clinical experience. After training facemask leak was low with both holds. Feedback indicated increased participant preference for two-handed PPV after training.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.