ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
The Impact of Telepsychiatry on Spatial Equity of Medicare-Reimbursed Private Psychiatric Service Utilisation Across States and Territories in Australia (2005-2023): A Time Series Analysis.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the trend of locational equity in utilising Medicare-reimbursed psychiatric consultations (face-to-face and telepsychiatry) across states/territories.
designTime series analysis of administrative data.
settingMedicare-reimbursed private psychiatric consultations.
main outcome measuresGreater coefficients of variation (CVs) represented higher state/territory variations in per capita consultations (2005 Q3-2023 Q4). We ran an autoregressive integrated moving average model for telepsychiatry-related CV change, with restricted rural-remote telepsychiatry items (2005-2022) and unrestricted telepsychiatry items (2020 Q1-2023 Q4) as the predictors. We examined the association between distance from mean per capita consultations and the fraction of per capita telepsychiatry consultations using state/territory-level data in another regression analysis, with telehealth legislative policy changes as another independent variable.
resultsIncluding telepsychiatry items since their introduction resulted in lower all-item CVs (i.e., reduced state/territory variation) than the corresponding CVs for face-to-face items only. The rural-remote-restricted telepsychiatry items had a larger effect than the unrestricted ones. Every 1000 restricted consultations were associated with 0.287 units of CV improvement (i.e., reduction in regional variation), in contrast to 0.007 units per 1000 consultations for unrestricted items. Telehealth-enabling policy changes significantly modified the association between distance from mean per capita face-to-face consultations and the fraction of telepsychiatry consultations. Lower per capita face-to-face consultations were associated with higher telepsychiatry fractions.
conclusionTelepsychiatry may help improve mental health equity. Bulk-billed, incentivised telepsychiatry for rural and remote areas may enhance regional health access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.