SynthesisMicrobiologyOpen2026
Iran's Escherichia coli AMR Landscape (2010-2025): A One Health Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Iran's Escherichia coli AMR Landscape (2010-2025): A One Health Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia coli (E. coli) has developed resistance to multiple antibiotic classes, complicating treatment in both human and veterinary medicine. This study assesses the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial resistance genes in E. coli in Iran, within a One Health framework encompassing humans, animals, foods, and the environment. We systematically searched Scopus, Google Scholar, Magiran, PubMed, Scientific Information Database Library (SID), and Web of Science, using keywords related to AMR and Escherichia coli, restricting to English and Persian publications from 2010 to January 2025. The risk of bias was evaluated using the JBI checklist for prevalence studies. Pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each antibiotic using random-effects models. A total of 368 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The highest resistance was observed in the Classes of Penicillins (71.7, 95% CI: 65.6-76.6) and the lowest for Fosfomycins (6.8, 95% CI: 5.2-8.5). Resistance to Ceftizoxime, Ertapenem, Streptomycin, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, and Colistin increased over time. Phenotypically, 47.2%, 20.2%, and 14.1% of E. coli isolates were identified as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL), AmpC, and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) producing, respectively. Among ESBL-producing isolates, the prevalence of bla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.