ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2026
Redundant mispair excision mechanisms in eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair.
Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA mismatch repair (MMR) corrects DNA replication errors, some forms of chemical damage to DNA bases, and acts in processes such as heteroduplex rejection, triplet repeat expansion, antibody maturation and cytotoxicity of alkylating agents. During MMR, the newly synthesized DNA strand containing the error must be removed and resynthesized to prevent mutations. In bacteria, this strand is displaced by the UvrD DNA helicase. In eukaryotes, this strand is excised by redundant pathways. In the first excision pathway identified,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.