Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830578›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2026

Baseline characteristics and practice patterns in geriatric vs. non-geriatric hemodialysis patients: initial results from a Thai nationwide multicenter prospective cohort (Thai-HDcohort).

Wanjak Pongsittisak, Jeerath Phannajit, Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai, Theerasak Tangwonglert, Thawee Chanchairujira, Kraiwiporn Kiattisunthorn, Kornchanok Vareesangthip, Bongkod Surattichaiyakul, Arkom Nongnuch, Surachet Vongsanim and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Wanjak PongsittisakNephrology and Renal Replacement therapy Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jeerath PhannajitDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wonngarm KittanamongkolchaiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Theerasak TangwonglertDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thawee ChanchairujiraRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kraiwiporn KiattisunthornRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornchanok VareesangthipRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bongkod SurattichaiyakulBhumirajanagarindra Kidney Institute Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arkom NongnuchFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surachet VongsanimFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-393X
Pantipa TonsawanFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Pornpen SangthawanFaculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Siribha ChangsirikulchaiSrinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phanupong PhutrakoolCenter for Data Management, AI, and Biostatistics (DAB), Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Peerapat ThanapongsatornDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Pichaya TantiyavarongDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Talerngsak KanjanabuchDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Khajohn TiranathanagulDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suchai SritippayawanRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suree YoowannakulBhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Vuddhidej OphascharoensukFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Paweena SusantitaphongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults represent a rapidly growing segment of the hemodialysis (HD) patient population. However, the specific clinical variations and dialysis management strategies employed for geriatric patients in Thailand remain poorly characterized.

methodsWe analyzed baseline data from 839 hemodialysis patients enrolled in the Thai-HDcohort, a prospective multicenter study across 13 clinical sites in Thailand. Patients were stratified into a geriatric group (≥ 65 years of age,

resultsGeriatric patients were more frequently treated in hospital-based facilities (75.0% vs. 67.4%,

conclusionsIn this cross-sectional study, geriatric hemodialysis patients showed distinct variations in prescriptions and vascular access. Longitudinal follow- up is essential to determine whether these conservative, individualized strategies improve clinical and survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Renal DialysisAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesThailandagedfrailtyHemodialysiskidney failurepractice patternsvascular access

Identifiers

PMID42830578
PMCPMC13644426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.