ArticleEcology letters2026
Functional Identity Drives Directional Shifts in Freshwater Plankton Biomass-Size Relationships.
Article in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Identity Drives Directional Shifts in Freshwater Plankton Biomass-Size Relationships.Ecology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body size is a master variable in ecology that can predict ecosystem-level processes and reflect environmental conditions across diverse ecosystems. In freshwater ecosystems, the relationship between body size and biomass provides a powerful tool for characterizing community structure and trophic transfer efficiency. While these relationships are well established at the whole-community level, responses within plankton functional groups with distinct ecological characteristics have yet to be explored. In this study, we analysed plankton biomass-size relationships across > 550 Canadian lakes. For phytoplankton, we found that mixotrophs exhibited positive biomass-size slopes, while autotrophs exhibited negative slopes. For zooplankton, herbivores exhibited relatively flat slopes, while non-herbivores exhibited negative slopes. Biomass-size relationships also differed among lake trophic states, but only for phytoplankton functional groups. This work should improve predictions and assessments of freshwater ecosystem functioning and food web pathways, based on our observation of directional shifts in biomass-size relationships across functional groups and trophic states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.