Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830440›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs2026

Cancer Risk Factors, Screening, and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Deprivation Across the U.S. Urban-to-Frontier Continuum.

Brody Gibson, Laurie Grieshober, Rachel M Ceballos, Tracy Onega, Jennifer Anne Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brody GibsonHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Laurie GrieshoberHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rachel M CeballosHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Tracy OnegaHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jennifer Anne DohertyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural U.S. populations experience higher cancer burden and lower utilization of preventive services. Heterogeneity within rural areas is poorly characterized, limiting identification of communities with the greatest needs.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of geographic variation in cancer-related risk behaviors and screening using tract-level Integrated Metropolitan-to-Frontier Area Codes (tIMFAC) with one urban (metropolitan) and four rural categories (micropolitan, frontier-micropolitan, small town/rural, and frontier-small town/rural). 2018 tract-level prevalences of colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening and risk behaviors were obtained from CDC PLACES. Demographic, neighborhood socioeconomic, and access-to-care characteristics were from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey. Adjusted mean prevalences were estimated using beta mixed-effects models with marginal standardization.

resultsNonmetropolitan tracts had greater socioeconomic disadvantage, more limited healthcare access, and higher smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity prevalences than metropolitan tracts. Screening differences across tIMFAC were greater for colorectal cancer (metropolitan vs. frontier-small town/rural: 64.5% vs. 61.2%) than for cervical and breast (84.5% vs. 82.6% and 75.5% vs. 74.6%, respectively). Screening declined with increasing neighborhood deprivation, particularly for colorectal (least deprived vs. most deprived: 67.4%-69.3% vs. 55.9%-57.3%) and cervical cancer (87.1%-87.6% vs. 79.5%-80.3%). Regional variation was greater for colorectal and breast than cervical cancer screening, with higher prevalences in the Northeast and lower in the West.

conclusionstIMFAC identified screening heterogeneity not captured by traditional rural-urban classifications, particularly for colorectal cancer. Neighborhood deprivation and region contributed greater screening differences than tIMFAC alone, suggesting interventions should prioritize disadvantaged communities, particularly in the West.

Identifiers

PMID42830440
PMCPMC13641163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.