Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830347›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Illuminant-dependent color inconstancy and metameric behavior of anodized titanium through silicone-based gingival simulation layers of varying thickness.

Akanay Copuroglu, Umur Davut, Ozge Doganay Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf Ozyilmaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akanay CopurogluDepartment of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Galata University Faculty of Dentistry, Haciahmet, Irmak Cd. DLP 1-9, Beyoglu, Istanbul, 34440, Turkey. akanay.copuroglu@galata.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-4965
Umur DavutDepartment of Prosthodontics, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Dentistry, Topkapı Mah. Adnan Menderes Bulvari, Vatan Cd. No:113, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-3080
Ozge Doganay OzyilmazDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Dentistry, Topkapı Mah. Adnan Menderes Bulvari, Vatan Cd. No:113, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-7774
Ozgun Yusuf OzyilmazDepartment of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Galata University Faculty of Dentistry, Haciahmet, Irmak Cd. DLP 1-9, Beyoglu, Istanbul, 34440, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4802-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated how gingival thickness and anodization color affect color perception of Grade V titanium discs under different light sources. Ninety-six titanium discs were anodized yellow, pink, or purple, or left non-anodized. Silicone gingival masks of 1 mm and 2 mm simulated soft tissue. A single spectral reflectance measurement was recorded for each specimen using a benchtop spectrophotometer, from which color coordinates under five standardized illuminants (D65, D50, A, F2, F11) were computationally derived. Color differences (ΔE₀₀) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula to evaluate color inconstancy, and metamerism was quantified using a CIEDE2000-based metamerism index (MI), the mean absolute difference between ΔE₀₀ under the test illuminants (D50, A, F2, F11) and D65. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc tests, and independent t-tests (α = 0.05). All anodized colors at 1 mm exceeded the CIEDE2000 clinical acceptability threshold (ΔE₀₀ >1.8), with purple showing the highest inconstancy, particularly under fluorescent lighting (P<.05). Increasing thickness to 2 mm significantly reduced ΔE₀₀ across all groups (P<.05), although values remained above the acceptability threshold in every group, with purple showing the greatest relative stability under all illuminants. Metameric behavior remained imperceptible under most conditions, except for pink at 1 mm under F2. Thickness and lighting significantly affect color stability of anodized titanium, although the effect of illuminant type was color-dependent: fluorescent (F2) illumination increased color inconstancy for purple and, at 2 mm, yellow, whereas pink showed the opposite pattern, with its lowest ΔE₀₀ values occurring under F2 rather than D65 at both thicknesses. Thinner tissue intensifies color shifts, while ≥ 2 mm thickness improves consistency. Pink performs better in thin tissue; purple shows greatest stability with thicker coverage. Metamerism was imperceptible under most conditions, except for pink at 1 mm under F2, which reached a perceptible but clinically acceptable level.

Indexed as

Anodized titaniumColor inconstancyEsthetic implant dentistryGingival thicknessSpectrophotometry

Identifiers

PMID42830347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.