ArticleOdontology2026
Illuminant-dependent color inconstancy and metameric behavior of anodized titanium through silicone-based gingival simulation layers of varying thickness.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated how gingival thickness and anodization color affect color perception of Grade V titanium discs under different light sources. Ninety-six titanium discs were anodized yellow, pink, or purple, or left non-anodized. Silicone gingival masks of 1 mm and 2 mm simulated soft tissue. A single spectral reflectance measurement was recorded for each specimen using a benchtop spectrophotometer, from which color coordinates under five standardized illuminants (D65, D50, A, F2, F11) were computationally derived. Color differences (ΔE₀₀) were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula to evaluate color inconstancy, and metamerism was quantified using a CIEDE2000-based metamerism index (MI), the mean absolute difference between ΔE₀₀ under the test illuminants (D50, A, F2, F11) and D65. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc tests, and independent t-tests (α = 0.05). All anodized colors at 1 mm exceeded the CIEDE2000 clinical acceptability threshold (ΔE₀₀ >1.8), with purple showing the highest inconstancy, particularly under fluorescent lighting (P<.05). Increasing thickness to 2 mm significantly reduced ΔE₀₀ across all groups (P<.05), although values remained above the acceptability threshold in every group, with purple showing the greatest relative stability under all illuminants. Metameric behavior remained imperceptible under most conditions, except for pink at 1 mm under F2. Thickness and lighting significantly affect color stability of anodized titanium, although the effect of illuminant type was color-dependent: fluorescent (F2) illumination increased color inconstancy for purple and, at 2 mm, yellow, whereas pink showed the opposite pattern, with its lowest ΔE₀₀ values occurring under F2 rather than D65 at both thicknesses. Thinner tissue intensifies color shifts, while ≥ 2 mm thickness improves consistency. Pink performs better in thin tissue; purple shows greatest stability with thicker coverage. Metamerism was imperceptible under most conditions, except for pink at 1 mm under F2, which reached a perceptible but clinically acceptable level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42830347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.