ArticleOdontology2026
Sex and academic level influence the evolution of stress among dental students: a three-year longitudinal cohort study.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess changes in stress levels in the dental environment among students over a three-year period and to investigate associations with gender and academic level. A total of 149 students from a public university in southern Brazil completed the Dental Environment Stress (DES) questionnaire between 2020 and 2023, where higher scores reflect greater perceived stress. Stress evolution was evaluated using delta (Δ) scores (2023 minus 2020), meaning positive values indicate an increase in stress over time. Associations were tested by paired t-test and by adjusted linear regression. Most of participants were women (66.4%) and enrolled in undergraduate programs at baseline. Although women had higher absolute DES scores, men and undergraduate students showed greater increases over time. In addition to the total DES score, significant increases over time were observed in two specific domains: Patient Responsibilities (Δ = +3.94 ± 4.33 for men [p < 0.001] vs. +2.85 ± 4.95 for women [p < 0.001]) and Institutional Factors (Δ = +4.98 ± 6.18 for men [p < 0.0p1] vs. +2.26 ± 7.26 for women [p = 0.003]). In the adjusted models, men gender (β = 8.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-17.76) and undergraduate status (β = 13.36; 95% CI: 3.79-22.94) remained significantly associated with greater delta changes in DES scores. These findings suggest that the return to in-person clinical and academic activities after the pandemic may have affected students differently, depending on gender and academic level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42830346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.