Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830302›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Optimising antibiotic switching via forecasting of patient physiology.

Magnus Ross, Nel Swanepoel, Akish Luintel, Emma McGuire, Ingemar J Cox, Steve Harris, Vasileios Lampos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magnus RossDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for AI, UCL, UK. magnus.ross@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2923-3305
Nel SwanepoelInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-9460
Akish LuintelDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Infection Division, University College Hospital London, London, UK.
Emma McGuireDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Infection Division, University College Hospital London, London, UK.
Ingemar J CoxDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for AI, UCL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6662-417X
Steve HarrisInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, UK.
Vasileios LamposDepartment of Computer Science, Centre for AI, UCL, UK. v.lampos@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-2063

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/X031276/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely transition from intravenous to oral antibiotic therapy shortens hospital stays, reduces catheter-related infections, and lowers healthcare costs, yet one in five patients in England remain on intravenous antibiotics despite meeting switching criteria. Clinical decision support systems can improve switching rates, but approaches that learn from historical decisions reproduce the delays and inconsistencies of routine practice. We propose using neural processes to model vital sign trajectories probabilistically, predicting switch-readiness by comparing forecasts against clinical guidelines rather than learning from past actions, and ranking patients to prioritise clinical review. The design yields interpretable outputs, adapts to updated guidelines without retraining, and preserves clinical judgement. Validated on datasets from US intensive care (6333 encounters) and a UK academic hospital group (10,584 encounters), the system selects 2.2-3.2 × more relevant patients than random. We show that forecasting patient physiology offers a principled foundation for decision support in antibiotic stewardship.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAdministration, OralForecastingHumansLength of StayAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42830302
PMCPMC13635169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.