Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830288›Full record

ArticleSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026

Multi-omics profiling reveals homologous recombination repair hyperactivation as a therapeutic vulnerability in neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma.

Binhua Dong, Yue Wang, Yunna Qin, Lihua Chen, Yuxuan Huang, Ting Yang, Xianhua Liu, Xiaohong Chen, Yanlin Chen, Yanhua Lin and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Binhua Dong *Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-0696
Yue Wang *Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yunna Qin *Department of Pathology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Lihua Chen *Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yuxuan Huang *Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Ting YangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Fujian Provincial Jianxin Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xianhua LiuDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaohong ChenZhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Yanlin ChenLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yanhua LinDepartment of Gynecology, Mindong Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Ningde, China.
Saihua ZhengDepartment of Gynecology, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.
Shuxia XuDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xinyu YaoDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Shiyin ChenDepartment of Pathology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ling LiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Xiaowen PuCervical disease center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. puxiaowen@51mch.com.
Juntao YangState Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences & School of Basic Medicine, National Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. yangjt@pumc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-391X
Pengming SunLaboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. fmsun1975@fjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82271658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is an aggressive and rare malignancy comprising 0.9-1.5% of cervical cancers. Its molecular basis remains poorly understood, limiting treatment options. A national multicenter cohort survival analysis showed that NECC patients had a 5.17-fold higher death risk than non-NECC patients and demonstrated broad chemotherapy resistance, which was further validated in both NECC cell lines and patient-derived organoids. To identify therapeutic targets, multi‑omics profiling of NECC tumors and matched normal adjacent tissues revealed pronounced DNA replication stress and hyperactivation of homologous recombination repair (HRR). These findings were validated in cells and patient-derived organoids using DR-GFP reporter and pRPA32 assays, suggesting that NECC may be susceptible to PARP inhibitor therapy. NECC cells exhibited moderate PARP inhibitor sensitivity, greater than that of resistant non‑NECC lines but less than that of highly sensitive A2780 cells. However, combining PARP inhibitors with cisplatin/carboplatin did not enhance efficacy, prompting the exploration of alternative combinatorial targets. Multi-omics analysis and in vitro validation identified Bloom syndrome helicase (BLM) as a key factor overexpressed in NECC that modulates PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Further in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that combining PARP and BLM inhibitors achieved potent anticancer effects. Mechanistically, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) infiltration in the tumor microenvironment upregulated the transcription factor E2F1 via IL6, with ChIP‒qPCR verifying that activated E2F1 directly binds the BLM promoter (hg38, chr15:90,715,346-90,717,346) to drive its expression, suppressing PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Our findings establish dual PARP and BLM inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for NECC by blocking HRR pathway compensation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineE2F1 Transcription FactorRecombinational DNA RepairRecQ HelicasesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAnimalsCarboplatinCell Line, TumorCisplatinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMultiomicsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBloom syndrome proteinCarboplatinCisplatinE2F1 Transcription FactorPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsRecQ Helicases

Identifiers

PMID42830288
PMCPMC13635247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.