Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830262›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Effectiveness of Emotion-Focused Therapy for Self-Criticism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yi Wang, Conor Douris, Ladislav Timulak

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi WangSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4572-0393
Conor DourisSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8383-4972
Ladislav TimulakSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-0753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problematic self-criticism has been widely recognised as a transdiagnostic factor associated with a range of mental health disorders. Emotion-focused therapy (EFT) targets self-criticism primarily via two-chair dialogue for self-criticism, a core intervention within the approach. An increasing number of pre-post studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effectiveness of EFT in reducing self-criticism. The present meta-analysis synthesised existing quantitative studies utilising EFT to reduce self-criticism and evaluated its overall effectiveness across study designs. Four pre-post studies and seven RCTs were identified through a systematic literature search. Effect sizes were calculated separately for 11 within-group pre-post EFT intervention groups (four single-arm pre-post studies and seven RCT intervention groups) and seven between-group RCT comparisons. Study quality, risk of bias and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Using random-effects models, the pooled within-group effect size (Hedges' g) was -0.86, and the pooled between-group effect size in RCTs was -0.73, indicating moderate to large effects of EFT in reducing self-criticism. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses showed that these effects remained robust after the removal of outliers. This meta-analysis provides the first quantitative synthesis of EFT for self-criticism and offers preliminary evidence supporting its effectiveness in addressing this transdiagnostic factor linked to the number of mental health difficulties.

Indexed as

Emotion-Focused TherapyMental DisordersSelf-AssessmentSelf ConceptHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeemotion‐focused therapymeta‐analysisself‐criticism

Identifiers

PMID42830262
PMCPMC13634925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.