ArticleNursing open2026
Experiences of Intensive Care Nurses in Their Practice of Physical Restraint Among Patients: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlthough physical restraint causes mental and physical harm to patients, such practice occurs worldwide to ensure patient safety. It is non-standard practice for a number of reasons, including the lack of education, training, and protocol.
objectiveThis study aims to determine the experiences of nurses who apply physical restraint to patients.
methodsA descriptive phenomenological method was employed in this study, wherein semi-structured interviews were the data collection method. In this qualitative study, the data consisted of semi-structured individual interviews with nurses (n = 20). The data were analysed phenomenologically and were arranged with MAXqda 22 analysis software. The study complies with the COREQ checklist.
resultsSix main themes were found from the data. The themes were (i) experiences related to nurses' physical restraint procedures, (ii) ethical balance in nursing, (iii) nurses' emotions, (iv) the meaning of physical restraint, (v) nurses' observations regarding patients' reactions to physical restraints, and (vi) the experience of ethical dilemmas. The nurses perceived physical restraint as being uncomfortable, a necessity or an obligation, as beneficial for patients, and a practice seen as punishment.
conclusionsThe findings showed that physical restraint elicited diverse thoughts and emotions among nurses, who reported difficulties in coping with these emotions and insufficient knowledge of restraint procedures. Nurses also described the need to protect patient safety while preserving patient autonomy, highlighting the ethical balance involved in decisions concerning physical restraint. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: This study has provided insight that can guide clinician nurses, educators, and policy-makers in improving physical restraint administration. The lack of knowledge held among nurses as to physical restraint procedures emphasizes the importance of education and training on this topic and can suggest areas of development for pertinent policies and guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.