Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829969›Full record

SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Dermal Scaffolds in Complex Extremity Wound Reconstruction: Impact of Early Application on Grafting and Flap Requirements-A Systematic Review.

Rania Darwish, Simon M Kratzer, Deepak M Kalaskar, Peter Butler, Suvashis Dash

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rania DarwishDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1120-7960
Simon M KratzerDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.
Deepak M KalaskarDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-1816
Peter ButlerDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-1493
Suvashis DashDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-6147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex extremity wounds from burns or trauma often involve exposed tendon or bone, making direct skin grafting unreliable and increasing the likelihood of flap reconstruction. This review evaluated whether early dermal scaffold application reduces subsequent surgical requirements. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2026. Of 409 records screened, 10 studies comprising 415 scaffold-treated wounds in 414 patients were included. Outcomes were synthesised descriptively and stratified by aetiology; meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity. Across nine non-randomised studies (393 patients), 38 (9.7%) healed without grafting and 352 (89.6%) were grafted. Graft avoidance differed markedly by aetiology: 32 of 192 trauma patients (16.7%) versus 0 of 190 burn patients (0%). All trauma events arose from three studies of small, highly selected defects, whereas three further trauma cohorts using immediate or staged grafting reported none. In the single randomised trial, scaffold take succeeded in 5 of 22 patients (22.7%) and all were grafted, whereas the graft-only comparator achieved complete coverage success, although scar quality was better with the scaffold (Vancouver Scar Scale 2.40 vs. 7.45, p < 0.001). No study contained a flap comparator, and certainty of evidence was very low for five of seven outcomes and low for two. Current evidence suggests early dermal scaffold application may reduce reconstructive burden in selected trauma wounds, whereas in burns scaffolds appear to enable staged grafting rather than replace it. Reconstructive downstaging is presented as an exploratory framework, not a validated outcome.

Indexed as

BurnsExtremitiesPlastic Surgery ProceduresSkin TransplantationSurgical FlapsTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingHumansSkin, Artificialburn injurydermal scaffoldextremity woundsflap reconstructionskin grafttrauma reconstructionwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42829969
PMCPMC13634600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.