SynthesisWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
Dermal Scaffolds in Complex Extremity Wound Reconstruction: Impact of Early Application on Grafting and Flap Requirements-A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex extremity wounds from burns or trauma often involve exposed tendon or bone, making direct skin grafting unreliable and increasing the likelihood of flap reconstruction. This review evaluated whether early dermal scaffold application reduces subsequent surgical requirements. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and clinical trial registries were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2026. Of 409 records screened, 10 studies comprising 415 scaffold-treated wounds in 414 patients were included. Outcomes were synthesised descriptively and stratified by aetiology; meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity. Across nine non-randomised studies (393 patients), 38 (9.7%) healed without grafting and 352 (89.6%) were grafted. Graft avoidance differed markedly by aetiology: 32 of 192 trauma patients (16.7%) versus 0 of 190 burn patients (0%). All trauma events arose from three studies of small, highly selected defects, whereas three further trauma cohorts using immediate or staged grafting reported none. In the single randomised trial, scaffold take succeeded in 5 of 22 patients (22.7%) and all were grafted, whereas the graft-only comparator achieved complete coverage success, although scar quality was better with the scaffold (Vancouver Scar Scale 2.40 vs. 7.45, p < 0.001). No study contained a flap comparator, and certainty of evidence was very low for five of seven outcomes and low for two. Current evidence suggests early dermal scaffold application may reduce reconstructive burden in selected trauma wounds, whereas in burns scaffolds appear to enable staged grafting rather than replace it. Reconstructive downstaging is presented as an exploratory framework, not a validated outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.