Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829904›Full record

ArticleMolecular reproduction and development2026

Global Proteomic Analysis of Sperm and Seminal Plasma From Tropically-Adapted Rams With Contrasting Parameters of Frozen-Thawed Semen.

Wallisson Bruno de Morais Pacheco, Iran Aguila Maciel, Suane Santos Alves Dos Santos, Alan Martins de Araújo, Francisca Nágila Matos Almeida, Denise Damasceno Guerreiro, Sheheryar Sheheryar, Lais Lacerda Brasil de Oliveira, Felipe Domingos de Sousa, Mohibullah Shah and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular reproduction and development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Wallisson Bruno de Morais PachecoGraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ceará State University, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5482-3446
Iran Aguila MacielGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0229-9998
Suane Santos Alves Dos SantosSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Ceará State University, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-0895
Alan Martins de AraújoGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0903-9177
Francisca Nágila Matos AlmeidaGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5790-221X
Denise Damasceno GuerreiroGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-8523
Sheheryar SheheryarGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-0485
Lais Lacerda Brasil de OliveiraDrug Research and Development Center, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Felipe Domingos de SousaCenter of Experimental Biology, The University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-7296
Mohibullah ShahGraduate Program in Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6126-7102
Maria Elisabete Amaral MoraesDrug Research and Development Center, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto Koscky PaierDrug Research and Development Center, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-4644
Ana Cristina de Oliveira MonteiroCenter of Experimental Biology, The University of Fortaleza (Unifor), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-6808
Carminda Sandra Brito Salmito-VanderleyGraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ceará State University, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-2021
Arlindo A MouraGraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ceará State University, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 312742/2022-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 405048/2024-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 445245/2024-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) 448945/2025-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (FUNCAP)Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCT) - Reprodução Animal (CNPq) 406866/2022-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterize the proteome of sperm and seminal plasma (SP) from rams with high semen freezability (HF) and low semen freezability (LF). Eleven ejaculates were collected from 12 rams, at 3-day intervals, and cryopreserved (132 semen samples). For proteomic analysis, sperm and SP samples were pooled separately for each ram. Pools 1 and 2 included ejaculates obtained on odd-numbered and even-numbered collection days, respectively. This generated 24 sperm and 24 SP pools. Sperm and SP proteins were analyzed by mass spectrometry, and computational biology platforms, used for calculation of differentially abundant proteins (DAPs; p < 0.05) in HF (n = 5) and LF (n = 7) rams. Total sperm motility decreased from 91.87% ± 0.63% in fresh to 65.65% ± 2.58% in frozen-thawed semen of HF rams; and decreased from 89.47% ± 1.15% to 50.05% ± 2.33% in LF rams. Reduction in total sperm motility after cryopreservation was lower in HF (26.22% ± 2.39%) compared to LF rams (37.70% ± 2.23%; p = 0.006). Sperm progressive motility decreased less in HF rams (from 87.20% ± 0.50% to 58.12% ± 2.82%) than in LF rams (from 85.54% ± 1.41% to 44.00 ± 2.13; p = 0.006). Rams with the HF phenotype had better plasma membrane (39.00% ± 2.79% vs. 15.14% ± 0.92%) and acrosome integrity (37.54% ± 2.72% vs. 15.40% ± 1.92%; p < 0.001) than LF rams. Sperm motility was similar in fresh semen of HF and LF rams. There were 1599 and 1677 sperm proteins identified in HF and LF rams, with 73 and 76 DAPs, respectively. SP had 1127 proteins, with 25 and 45 DAPs in HF and LF rams. This is the greatest coverage ever published about the ram SP proteome. Sperm proteins with greater abundance in HF rams were extracellular and immune-related proteins, antiproteases, chaperones and structural regulators, contributing to cytoskeletal integrity, apoptotic resistance and maintenance of proteostasis. Sperm proteins with greater abundance in LF rams were mainly mitochondrial subunits, axonemal components, and bioenergetic enzymes, indicating greater reliance on oxidative processes. Major components of HF SP participate in sperm protection, stabilization of membrane lipids, calcium fluxes, epididymal maturation and ATP availability. The major LF SP proteome was associated with cellular stress, inflammatory responses, oxidative damage and ATP production. Thus, the nature of sperm and SP proteome atlas potentially defines ram sperm cryoresilience.

Indexed as

CryopreservationProteomeProteomicsSemenSemen PreservationSpermatozoaAnimalsMaleSheepSperm MotilitySperm ProteinsProteomeSperm Proteinscryopreservationproteomeramsseminal plasmaspermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID42829904
PMCPMC13634415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.