Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829899›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

CDC AIDS Project 72: The Prostitute Study.

William W Darrow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William W DarrowDepartment of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA. darroww@fiu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-6119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, the occurrence and potential for heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV 1) in the United States were uncertain. To better understand infection among women and the possible role of prostitution in the emerging epidemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention established CDC AIDS Project 72, a multisite study of 1 410 women with recent histories of prostitution recruited from eight areas of the United States during 1986 and 1987. Participants were interviewed, examined, and tested for serologic markers of HIV 1, hepatitis B virus (HBV), syphilis, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV 1 and HSV 2), and human T cell lymphotropic virus types I and II (HTLV I/II). HIV 1 antibodies were detected in approximately 12% of women tested, but prevalence varied considerably across study sites. HSV 2 was the most commonly detected infection, followed by HSV 1, HBV, syphilis, HIV 1, and HTLV I/II. HIV 1, HBV, and HTLV I/II were strongly associated with injection drug use, whereas syphilis and HSV 2 followed different patterns related to sexual exposure. Among women without evidence of injection drug use, infrequent condom use during vaginal intercourse with clients was associated with HIV 1 infection. Project 72 showed that prostitution alone did not explain infection risk among these women. Injection drug use, sexual and injection networks, local prevalence of infection, and the social circumstances in which women lived and worked were also important. The project contributed to an evolving public health approach that emphasized epidemiologic evidence, cooperation with affected communities, and practical strategies for reducing risk rather than assumptions about stigmatized populations.

Indexed as

Acquired immunodeficiency syndromeEpidemiologyHuman immunodeficiency virusesProstitutionSexually transmitted diseasesSubstance abuse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.