Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829852›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of medicine2026

Repeated remimazolam sedation for interstitial brachytherapy in cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Yanqing Wang, Handan Yang, Qian Gu, Huaiming Wang, Jiaxin Sun, Yiquan Xu, Jinjun Shu, Deling Zeng

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanqing WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9233-445X
Handan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Qian GuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xichang People's Hospital, Xichang, China.
Huaiming WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jiaxin SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yiquan XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jinjun ShuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-7389
Deling ZengHealth Management Center, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3044-1746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence regarding repeated remimazolam administration remains limited. We hypothesized that remimazolam would be associated with fewer adverse events than propofol while maintaining stable sedative requirements across three repeated sedation sessions.

methodsPatients with cervical cancer undergoing three fractions of interstitial brachytherapy were randomized to propofol or remimazolam. The primary outcome was the proportion of sedation episodes with at least one prespecified intraoperative adverse event across three sessions. Secondary outcomes included sedative dose, hemodynamics, and sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS).

resultsA total of 100 participants were randomized, of whom 91 completed all three prespecified sedation sessions and were included in the primary per-protocol analysis (46 in the propofol group and 45 in the remimazolam group). Across 138 propofol and 135 remimazolam episodes, overall adverse events were less frequent with remimazolam (17.78% vs. 59.42%; RR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.18-0.49;

conclusionAcross three consecutive sedation sessions for interstitial brachytherapy, remimazolam was associated with fewer respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events than propofol, while sedative requirements remained stable across the three sessions.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2500108294).

Indexed as

BrachytherapyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesPropofolremimazolamadverse eventspropofolRemimazolamrepeated sedationsleep quality

Identifiers

PMID42829852
PMCPMC13644436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.