Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829781›Full record

ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026

The impact of helicopter teaching in nursing education and approaches to foster independent learning: A narrative review.

Kalpana Thakur, Suresh K Sharma, Thungchanbeni Ezung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kalpana ThakurCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Suresh K SharmaCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Thungchanbeni EzungCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'helicopter teaching' in nursing education can be harmful to the development of clinical judgement, decision-making, and autonomy among nursing students because it involves excessive control, constant supervision, and over-dependence. This narrative review examines the impact of helicopter teaching on the academic and professional development of nursing students. It also discusses evidence-based approaches that encourage independent learning and resilience. We searched databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus with a mixture of search terms and Medical Subject Headings to analyze the evidence between 2010 and 2024. The review identified several contributing factors behind this helicopter style of teaching including faculty anxiety, a lack of confidence in student competency, and institutional pressures relating to patient safety. The study also examined how such practices can negatively impact student learning and these include reduced confidence, limited thinking and dependence on instructors. The article also focused on educational theories like Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development or experiential learning models to propose evidence-based strategies for countering overprotection including scaffolded education, safe-to fail environments, reflection debriefings, growth zone challenges and peer coaching between faculty. These approaches can help nursing educators create a learning environment that balances patient care with the development of competent and independent future nurses to enter real-world clinical practices. Institutions must prioritize faculty development, curriculum changes and supervised autonomy as core components of nursing education.

Indexed as

Clinical teaching strategieshelicopter teachingoverprotective teachingreflective debriefingscaffolded learning

Identifiers

PMID42829781
PMCPMC13633817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.