ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Comparison of Different Corticosteroid Regimens for Refractory
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refractory Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 216 children with RMPP hospitalized between January 2023 and June 2025 were categorized by corticosteroid regimen: Group A (low-dose methylprednisolone, 1-2 mg/kg/day intravenously for 3-5 days, n=73), Group B (high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy, 10-30 mg/kg/day for 3 days, n=70), and Group C (step-down regimen: pulse therapy for 3 days followed by an oral prednisolone taper, n=73). The primary outcome was time to fever resolution after corticosteroid initiation. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), and E-value analyses were performed. Results: Baseline characteristics were largely comparable, although white blood cell counts differed (P=0.013). Defervescence was faster in Groups B (2.40 ± 1.00 days) and C (2.00 ± 0.78 days) than in Group A (4.25 ± 1.71 days; both P<0.001); the Group C-versus-Group B difference (adjusted P=0.047) occurred largely before the oral taper began. Group C had the shortest hospital stay (8.26 ± 1.74 days) and the highest treatment effectiveness (89.04% vs 82.86% vs 64.38%; P=0.001), but the adjusted Group C-versus-Group B comparison was not significant (OR 2.17; 95% CI 0.77-6.12). Both high-dose regimens were independently associated with treatment effectiveness versus Group A (Group C: OR 5.26, 95% CI 2.08-13.32; E-value 2.16) and with faster defervescence; IPTW analyses yielded consistent results. Thirty-day readmission did not differ significantly (exact P=0.130). Conclusion: High-dose corticosteroid regimens were associated with faster defervescence and higher treatment effectiveness than low-dose therapy in children with RMPP. Whether an oral taper after pulse therapy provides additional benefit remains uncertain and warrants prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.