ArticleCureus2026
Pregnancy Outcomes of Cervical Cerclage in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical insufficiency is an important cause of recurrent second-trimester pregnancy loss and spontaneous preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage is a surgery done to strengthen the cervix to prolong the pregnancy in women who need it. The result of a cerclage can vary based on the obstetric history, gestational age at the time of the cerclage, cervical length, pregnancy type, and timing of the removal.
aimTo compare the obstetric and demographic features, timing of cervical cerclage, gestational age at delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who underwent cervical cerclage at a tertiary-care centre. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study was a record-based observational study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College Jammu, in a retrospective manner. A review of the medical records was performed for 150 pregnant women who had undergone either history-indicated cervical cerclage, ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage, or emergency cervical cerclage. A structured proforma was used to gather information about demographic data, previous obstetric history, gestational age at cerclage placement, pre-procedure cervical length, timing of cerclage removal, gestational age at delivery, birth outcome, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal mortality. The categorical data were presented in frequencies and percentages. The Pearson chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used, and a p-value less than 0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant.
resultsThe majority of participants were aged 31-40 years, accounting for 94 (62.7%) women. Most were nulliparous, 85 (56.7%), and 78 (52.0%) belonged to the middle socioeconomic group. A total of 95 (63.3%) women had experienced three or more previous abortions, while 48 (32.0%) had undergone cervical cerclage previously. Cerclage was performed at 14-17 weeks of gestation in 79 (52.7%) women, and 78 (52.0%) had a pre-procedure cervical length of more than 15 mm and up to 25 mm. Twin pregnancies accounted for 39 (26.0%) cases. Cerclage removal was performed between 36 and 37 weeks in 98 (65.3%) women. Delivery after 37 weeks occurred in 93 (62.0%) women, while 128 (85.3%) delivered at or beyond 34 weeks. The live-birth rate was 88.0% (132), NICU admission was required in 28 (18.7%) pregnancies, and neonatal mortality occurred in 6 (4.0%). Normal birth weight above 2.5 kg was recorded in 116 (77.3%) newborns. The distributions of the major study variables were statistically significant (p<0.05).
conclusionIn most women, cervical cerclage correlated with good pregnancy and foetal outcomes. Most pregnancies were prolonged beyond 34 weeks and live-birth and neonatal survival rates were high. Proper timing of cerclage and patient selection could help to achieve better perinatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.