ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Examination of students' perspectives regarding the effectiveness of clinical training: A research endeavor congruent with social responsibility.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical education is a fundamental component of medical training. This study examines the experiences of clinical students across various health professions to provide valuable insights for educational planners involved in designing effective and socially relevant clinical training curricula. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis descriptive-analytical study employed a stratified random sampling method to select clinical students from the disciplines of nursing, midwifery, operating room technology, and pre-hospital emergency medicine at educational institutions in Shoushtar. Data were gathered using a standardized questionnaire designed to evaluate factors affecting the quality of clinical education. The data were analyzed using Pearson correlation, Chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
resultsA total of 190 students participated in the study, including 60 males and 130 females, with ages ranging from 18 to 39 years. Participants were enrolled in nursing (
conclusionsThe mean scores related to educational objectives, instructor quality, student-teacher interactions, and the learning environment were lower among male students, older participants, and those enrolled in nursing and operating room programs. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to improve clinical training objectives, enhance the involvement of qualified instructors, and foster more supportive learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.