ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Functional outcomes and anatomy-based surgical strategy in 57 pineal region tumors.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pineal region tumors are uncommon lesions that present significant surgical challenges due to their deep location, proximity to critical neurovascular structures, and frequent association with obstructive hydrocephalus. Although several operative corridors are available, factors influencing postoperative functional recovery remain poorly defined. This study evaluated clinical, radiological, and surgical determinants of functional outcomes following surgery for pineal region tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 57 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment for pineal region tumors between March 2016 and August 2025 at a tertiary neurosurgical center. Clinical, radiological, operative, pathological, and follow-up data were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). Primary functional outcome was postoperative change in ΔKPS, with admission KPS analyzed separately to identify baseline determinants of preoperative functional status. Results: The mean age was 36.5 years, and 59.6% of patients were male. Gross total resection was achieved in 42 patients (73.7%), subtotal resection in 7 (12.3%), and biopsy alone in 8 (14.0%). Hydrocephalus was present in 45 patients (78.9%), with 12 (21.1%) ultimately requiring permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion. The posterior interhemispheric transsplenial approach was the most commonly used surgical corridor (36.8%). Increasing age and larger tumor volume independently predicted lower admission KPS scores, whereas lower preoperative KPS was associated with greater postoperative functional improvement. Surgical approach, extent of resection, pathology, and hydrocephalus treatment strategy were not significantly associated with functional recovery. The complication rate was 10.5%, with one perioperative mortality. Conclusion: Favorable functional outcomes and high resection rates can be achieved using multiple microsurgical and endoscopic approaches when operative corridor selection is tailored to individual anatomy. Within the limitations of this retrospective cohort, postoperative functional recovery was more strongly associated with baseline patient- and tumor-related factors than with the operative corridor selected. No statistically significant association between surgical approach and postoperative functional recovery was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.