ReviewImmunoTargets and therapy2026
Exploring the Potential Benefits of Biologic Therapies Beyond Respiratory Allergy.
Review in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe pediatric asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease that is most commonly driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation. Because respiratory viral infections are the leading triggers of asthma exacerbations in children, this review examines the effects of biologic therapies on infection-related outcomes and antiviral immune function, beyond their established role in asthma control. We conducted a structured narrative review of literature published from January 2000 through February 2026 using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies evaluating infection-related outcomes and immune effects of biologic therapies in pediatric asthma were analyzed. Available evidence consistently indicates that biologics have favorable infectious safety profiles without increasing the risk of serious or opportunistic infections. Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) showed the strongest evidence of direct immunomodulatory effects, including restoration of interferon-mediated antiviral responses and reduction of virus-triggered asthma exacerbations. Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor therapies have corticosteroid-sparing effects and preserve immune competence despite eosinophil depletion. Dupilumab and tezepelumab similarly provide sustained efficacy and stable safety profiles without increasing infectious burden. Real-world evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic further indicates that biologic-treated children do not have greater susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection or more severe disease. Overall, biologic therapies appear to provide targeted immunomodulation rather than broad immunosuppression, preserving host defense while controlling severe pediatric asthma. These findings suggest that biologic therapies may positively influence immune competence beyond asthma control, with implications for infection susceptibility and antiviral defense. Further prospective pediatric studies with standardized endpoints and long-term follow-up are needed to define their immunological impact and optimize precision-medicine strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.