ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Navigating the PhD thesis journey: A qualitative study of doctoral students and supervisors at a medical university in Iran.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe PhD thesis serves as a cornerstone of doctoral education, yet it is often accompanied by considerable stress and inefficiencies for both students and supervisors. Although global research has extensively addressed issues such as supervision quality, institutional support, and student well-being, there is limited investigation into these dynamics from a qualitative perspective in non-Western academic settings. This study examines the lived experiences of doctoral students and their supervisors at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences to identify challenges and propose tailored reforms for this specific context. MATERIALS AND
methodsEmploying a qualitative exploratory design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 54 participants (31 PhD students and 23 faculty supervisors) chosen through purposive sampling. The collected data underwent conventional content analysis, with themes integrated across both groups to form a unified framework.
resultsThe analysis revealed five overarching themes and 21 associated categories, including supervisory competencies, administrative ambiguity, resource limitations, psychological stress, and the importance of early research engagement. While students stressed the need for emotional support and resource availability, supervisors emphasized clearer regulations and opportunities for professional development. Both groups underscored the necessity of fostering a supportive academic environment.
conclusionThe PhD thesis process operates as a dynamic system influenced by interpersonal relationships, institutional frameworks, and procedural clarity. Efforts to reform this process should prioritize supervisor training programs, simplified administrative procedures, enhanced resource availability, and comprehensive psychological support embedded throughout the doctoral journey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.