ArticleSurgical neurology international2026
Single-stage microscopic and endoscopic resection of spatially separate meningiomas through a single craniotomy.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple meningiomas are frequently encountered; however, determining the optimal surgical strategy for single-stage resection can be challenging. Conventional approaches include performing multiple craniotomies or a single large craniotomy encompassing both lesions, which may be overly invasive depending on patient factors and tumor characteristics. Endoscopic approaches have increasingly been used to reduce the invasiveness of meningioma surgery, but their application to multiple lesions remains limited. Case Description: An 85-year-old man with incidentally discovered meningiomas located in the left parasagittal region (primary lesion) and the right convexity (separate lesion) underwent single-stage resection of both lesions. Based on meticulous preoperative simulation, both lesions were removed through a small craniotomy (3.5 × 2.5 cm) placed directly over the primary lesion. The parasagittal tumor was removed microscopically, while the separate convexity lesion was resected endoscopically. Endoscopic visualization enabled access to and resection of the separate lesion without additional bone removal. Conclusion: For selected patients deemed feasible and safe based on preoperative simulation, endoscopic resection of an additional convexity lesion located beyond the craniotomy site may provide a less invasive alternative to multiple or extended craniotomies. This approach may be beneficial for older adults, for whom minimizing surgical invasiveness is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.