ArticleClinical interventions in aging2026
Identification of Risk Factors and Prediction Models for Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Elderly Patients with Heart Failure.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elderly heart failure (HF) patients have an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. Identifying risk factors and developing a prediction model are clinically important. Study Method: We retrospectively enrolled 7076 elderly HF patients hospitalized from January 2019 to December 2023. All predictors were restricted to data available within 24 hours of admission and prior to AKI occurrence. Candidate predictors were first screened by univariate analysis (P<0.05) and then further refined by LASSO regression, and the selected variables were ultimately entered into multivariable logistic regression. Thirteen machine learning models were constructed and compared to identify the optimal model. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: AKI occurred in 796 patients (11.2%). The final model included diuretic use, hypertension, diabetes, valvular heart disease, COPD, CKD, admission cystatin C, and LVEF. Among the 13 machine learning models, logistic regression performed best in the validation set (AUC = 0.804, 95% CI: 0.777-0.830). Calibration was acceptable in both the training and validation sets, with Hosmer-Lemeshow P values of 0.561 and 0.605, calibration slopes of 0.896 and 0.835, and Brier scores of 0.078 and 0.082, respectively. Decision curve analysis confirmed its clinical utility. A nomogram was constructed for model visualization. Conclusion: In this single-center study with internal validation only, the prediction model demonstrated favorable performance for in-hospital AKI in elderly HF patients and may serve as a candidate tool for early risk stratification. External validation in independent cohorts is required before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.