ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Physical activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Long-term participation, activity volume and patient-reported limitations.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize long-term patient-reported sports and physical activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), including participation, weekly volume, perceived exertion, time to resumption, limitations, satisfaction and sex-based differences. Methods: This retrospective single-institution study included 150 patients who underwent primary UKA between 2014 and 2022. An 11-item electronic questionnaire administered in 2025 assessed activity at 5 years before UKA, 1 year before UKA, 1 year after UKA and at current follow-up. Current participation was the primary outcome. Historical responses were treated as retrospectively recalled estimates. Mean follow-up was 6.8 ± 2.4 years. Results: Of 190 contactable patients, 150 responded (78.9%). Mean age was 65.1 ± 10.9 years. Participation was recalled by 33.3% at 5 years before UKA, 8.0% at 1 year before UKA and 25.3% at 1 year after UKA; 33.3% reported current participation. Among current participants, 74.0% reported >3 h/week and 48.0% reported moderate-or-higher exertion. Overall, 49.3% resumed activity within 12 months, 42.0% perceived improvement and mean satisfaction was 3.84 ± 1.30. Activity-related limitations and long-term restrictions were reported by 75.3% and 30.0%, respectively. Most outcomes were similar between women and men; the fully adjusted association between male sex and improved intensity was not significant (adjusted odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 0.90-4.80). Conclusions: At long-term follow-up after UKA, one-third of patients reported current sports or physical activity participation, and most current participants reported >3 h/week. However, only half resumed activity within 12 months, and residual limitations were common. Historical group-level proportions should not be interpreted as individual return to activity or longitudinal recovery. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.