ArticleCancer management and research2026
Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index is Associated with Pressure Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the association between admission systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and incident pressure injury (PI) in hospitalized patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and assess its discriminative performance. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 428 hospitalized patients with NSCLC (119 with PI and 309 without PI). Admission SII was calculated from platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts. Logistic regression and ROC analyses were performed, with DeLong comparisons, bootstrap internal validation, calibration, and decision-curve analysis. Results: Patients with PI had higher SII than those without PI (median 1223.49 [IQR 963.35-1519.65] vs 868.37 [694.89-1089.19], P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, SII (OR per 100 units = 1.339, 95% CI: 1.223-1.466), BMI (OR = 0.549, 95% CI: 0.467-0.645), and CRP (OR = 1.254, 95% CI: 1.173-1.341) were independently associated with PI. The AUC was 0.763 for SII and 0.908 for the combined SII-BMI-CRP model; bootstrap optimism-corrected AUC was 0.904 (95% CI: 0.878-0.934). Conclusion: Higher admission SII was independently associated with incident PI and showed discrimination comparable to BMI, CRP, and NLR. The combined SII-BMI-CRP model showed greater discrimination with stable bootstrap internal validation. These findings support further evaluation of SII as an adjunct to clinical risk assessment, with external validation and baseline Braden Scale comparison warranted before routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.