ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2026
Cardiac Resynchronization as an Enabler of ARNI Efficacy: Insights From a Real-World Cohort.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) improves outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the potential synergy between device-based and pharmacological strategies remains underexplored. Methods: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of ARNI therapy on reverse remodeling, clinical response, and cardiovascular events at 1 year in CRT recipients, in order to clarify the potential synergistic role of pharmacological and device-based strategies. A retrospective cohort of 194 consecutive CRT patients was analyzed, of whom 65 (33.5%) received ARNI. Echocardiographic response was defined as an increase in LVEF > 5% or ≥ 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 12 months; clinical response as an improvement of at least one NYHA class. The primary endpoint was echocardiographic response. Device-detected remote monitoring heart failure (RM-HF) events were pre-specified as the key time-to-event endpoint, while mortality and HF hospitalization were exploratory. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable, although systolic blood pressure was higher in ARNI recipients. At 12 months, ARNI therapy was associated with greater reverse remodeling (ΔLVEF 14.4% ± 10.2% vs. 10.8% ± 11.0%, Conclusions: In this real-world CRT cohort, ARNI therapy enhanced reverse remodeling and reduced subclinical congestion events detected by remote monitoring. These findings support a synergistic interaction between CRT and ARNI, where resynchronization provides the substrate for pharmacological efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.