Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829506›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Progressive Liver Metastasis of Breast Cancer on Endocrine Therapy Showing Favorable Response to Additive Alternate-Day S-1 Therapy: A Case Report.

Kasumi Arizumi, Shoji Oura

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kasumi ArizumiDepartment of Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, JPN.
Shoji OuraDepartment of Surgery, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer with multiple organ metastases sometimes shows a discordant response to treatment depending on the site of the lesion. In addition, oncologists generally convert the treatment upon progression of a small part of metastatic lesions in a specific organ, even if most metastatic lesions continue to respond well to the treatment. A 49-year-old postmenopausal woman had undergone mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy followed by breast reconstruction using a silicone implant for her left breast cancer 11 years before and was referred to our hospital due to the muscle weakness of her left upper arm. The patient had presumed multiple bone metastases, supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, and liver metastasis on images. Based on the judgment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer, the patient received fulvestrant, palbociclib, and denosumab, leading to the alleviation of upper arm muscle weakness. Positron emission tomography (PET) showed a decrease in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the extrahepatic lesions and an increase in FDG uptake in the liver lesion at six months, and continued decrease of FDG uptake in the extrahepatic lesions and retained increase of FDG in the liver metastasis at 14 months. The patient, therefore, received additive alternate-day S-1 therapy to the first-line endocrine-based therapy, leading to the normalization of the elevated CA15-3 level, regression of the liver metastasis with decreased FDG uptake, and no additive adverse events. It was noteworthy that the addition of alternate-day S-1 therapy to the first-line endocrine-based therapy, clinically effective for extrahepatic lesions, led to the shrinkage of liver metastases without notable side effects.

Indexed as

alternate-day s-1 therapybreast cancerdiscordant responseliver metastasisluminal type

Identifiers

PMID42829506
PMCPMC13633131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.