ArticleBMC cancer2026
Impact of and recovery after Covid-19 on breast cancer diagnosis and care in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 negatively impacted cancer diagnostic and treatment services worldwide. These challenges were further compounded in low- and middle-income countries, where longstanding resource constraints limited the capacity to maintain standard treatment pathways. We aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on (i) stage at diagnosis and time intervals from symptom recognition to a pathological confirmed breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and (ii) treatment initiation at two academic hospitals in Johannesburg; Chris Hani Baragwaneth Academic Hospital (Site 1) and Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (Site 2).
methodsWe compared the proportion of BC cases diagnosed at a late stage (stage III/IV) and median time intervals of pre-contact (T
resultsLate-stage BC diagnoses increased during COVID-19 but subsequently recovered, with pre-, during-; and post-COVID-19 percentages, respectively, of 50%, 60% and 53% at Site 1 and 63%, 69% and 55% at Site 2. Compared to pre-COVID-19, at Site 1 the T
conclusionsThe already high prevalence of late-stage at diagnosis increased further during the COVID-19 pandemic with evidence of recovery at both sites in the post COVID-19 period. Treatment initiation delays increased and surgery volumes decreased during the pandemic and did not recover to pre-pandemic levels. Our study shows current cancer human and facility resources are insufficient to manage the steadily increasing BC burden in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.