ArticleBMC public health2026
Interdisciplinary modelling approaches for One Health in agri-food systems: a scoping review and conceptual analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasingly, the One Health approach must be applied to a changing food system to simultaneously support nutritional, infectious disease, and environmental outcomes. Successful interventions by public health authorities will require quantitative modelling for evaluating trade-offs and prioritization. Herein, we reviewed methodologies for One Health modelling relevant to the food system and proposed a framework for supporting international and national One Health initiatives within governmental institutions.
methodsThis study first identified an operational scope of One Health by reviewing the One Health Joint Plan of Action (OH-JPA) for proposed activities related to the food system. Then we cross-referenced their implementation within the Group of 20 countries through a review of their publicly available One Health resources. We next conducted a PRIMSA scoping review on One Health quantitative modelling with relevance to the food system from 2021 to 2026 to determine interdisciplinary collaboration, data types, and modelling methodologies. Lastly, we developed a conceptual framework for modelling within One Health initiatives involving the food system.
resultsWe found a narrow scope of institutional initiatives at the intersection of One Health and the food system. The activities proposed in the OH-JPA and executed in G20 governments focused on coordination, interoperability, and data sharing to support programs on antimicrobial resistance, zoonoses, and vector-borne diseases. The scoping review produced 129 relevant One Health research articles. In addition to epidemiologic data, One Health modelling used agricultural, geospatial, and ecological data for supporting food system topics. Quantitative modelling approaches either used heterogenous data, incorporated mixed effects, or integrated multiple models for scenario analysis. We proposed a modular framework for the operationalization of modelling in institutions to support interdisciplinary collaboration between food systems and One Health research.
conclusionsOne Health is a holistic approach, but in practice is narrowly implemented. Quantitative modelling in One Health reflects the complex dynamics in the animal-human-environment interface. Infrastructure for genomic, geospatial, and agricultural data would facilitate interdisciplinary modelling approaches beneficial for One Health in the food system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.