Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829434›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026

Is there a difference in knee biomechanics due to fatigue of the quadriceps versus hamstrings during landing on a single limb? a randomized comparative laboratory study.

Waleed S Mahmoud, Marwa M Ibrahim, Mohammed Moustafa Hegazy, Saud M Alrawaili, Sahar Mahmoud Hassan, Soheir M Abdel Rahman, Nadia L Radwan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Waleed S MahmoudDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia. waleeds306@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-3433
Marwa M IbrahimDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Moustafa HegazyDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Saud M AlrawailiDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Sahar Mahmoud HassanDepartment of physical therapy, Cairo university hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Soheir M Abdel RahmanDepartment of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Nadia L RadwanDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Riyadh, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2026/R/1447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quadriceps and hamstring muscles play a central role in absorbing impact forces and maintaining dynamic knee stability during landing tasks. Together, these muscle groups also strongly influence knee joint kinematics and kinetics. This study aimed to compare the effects of induced fatigue of the quadriceps and hamstring muscles on the kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint during a single-leg landing in a forward-drop jump task.

methodsOf the 108 athletes (aged 20-25 years) randomized to either the quadriceps or hamstring fatigue group, 93 completed the study and were analyzed. The peak knee flexion angle, vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), anterior tibial shear force, and knee flexion-extension and abduction-adduction moments were measured before and after inducing fatigue in the quadriceps or hamstrings during a forward-drop jump with a single-leg landing.

resultsHamstring fatigue significantly reduced the peak knee flexion angle (p < 0.001) compared with quadriceps fatigue. Also, hamstring fatigue significantly increased the vGRF and anterior tibial shear force (p < 0.001) more than quadriceps fatigue. The peak flexion moment demonstrated a significant Group × Time interaction (p = 0.022), decreasing significantly following hamstring fatigue (p < 0.001). Conversely, the peak extension moment showed a significant Group × Time interaction (p < 0.001), decreasing significantly following quadriceps fatigue (p < 0.001). The knee abduction and adduction moments were significantly affected (p < 0.001) by quadriceps fatigue more than by hamstring fatigue.

conclusionHamstring fatigue was associated with greater changes in knee flexion angle, vertical ground reaction force, anterior tibial shear force, and peak flexion moment, whereas quadriceps fatigue induced more disturbances in knee abduction and adduction moments. These findings highlight distinct, muscle-specific changes in surrogate biomechanical measures that reflect different mechanical pathways associated with ACL loading. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial was registered on 5/5/2023, Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial, Identifier: (IRCT20230329057784N1).

Indexed as

Hamstring fatigueQuadriceps fatigueSingle-leg landingThree-dimensional analysis

Identifiers

PMID42829434
PMCPMC13633636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.