Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829432›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2026

CDK2/9 blockade remodels chromatin and drives phenotypic plasticity in glioblastoma organoids.

Philipp Kaps, Anne Sophie Hieltscher, Andrea Auditore, Christoph Kamper, Sophie-Charlotte Nelz, Jacqueline Heskamp, Paul Meißner, Annabell Wolff, Katharina Richter, Jakob Brandstetter and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Philipp KapsDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Anne Sophie HieltscherDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Andrea AuditoreFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Extracorporeal Therapy Systems, Rostock, Germany.
Christoph KamperFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Extracorporeal Therapy Systems, Rostock, Germany.
Sophie-Charlotte NelzFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Extracorporeal Therapy Systems, Rostock, Germany.
Jacqueline HeskampFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Department of Extracorporeal Therapy Systems, Rostock, Germany.
Paul MeißnerDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Annabell WolffDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Katharina RichterDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Jakob BrandstetterDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Piotr GrabarczykDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinic III-Hematology, Oncology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Sascha Troschke-MeurerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Burkhard HinzInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Felix WittigInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Daniel DubinskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Florian GesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas M FreimanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Susanne StählkeInstitute of Cell Biology, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Philipp-Kjell FichtClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Lars BoeckmannClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Christian PolleyFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Carl-Friedrich ClassenUniversity Children's Hospital, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Christian JunghanssDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Claudia MaletzkiDepartment of Internal Medicine - Clinic and Polyclinic for Hematology, Hemostaseology, Oncology, Stem Cell Therapy and Palliative Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Straße 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany. claudia.maletzki@med.uni-rostock.de.

Funding

Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung 60- 0102-01.P640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) remains a highly lethal brain tumor with limited therapeutic options and pervasive resistance to standard treatments. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), key regulators of cell cycle progression and transcription, are frequently dysregulated in GBM and contribute to tumor pathogenesis.

methodsWe employed a range of preclinical GBM models-including 2D cultures, 3D spheroids, patient-derived organoids (PDOs), and multicellular 3D bioprints-to evaluate the effects of the CDK2/9 inhibitor fadraciclib in comparison to the standard-of-care temozolomide. Endpoints included cell viability, stress responses, immune-modulatory effects, and transcriptomic reprogramming.

resultsFadraciclib robustly reduces cell viability and invasion in all patient-specific 2D- and 3D models. This effect was independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, demonstrating superior efficacy to temozolomide. Mechanistically, fadraciclib disrupted lysosomal, mitochondrial, and endoplasmic reticulum integrity and increased γH2AX levels, indicating enhanced DNA double-strand breaks. Seahorse analysis demonstrated impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics following fadraciclib treatment. In a triple-culture blood-brain barrier (BBB) model, fadraciclib demonstrated effective BBB penetration and antitumoral activity against GBM cells, while exhibiting minor cytotoxicity toward brain-specific normal cells. In semi-autologous co-culture systems, fadraciclib inhibited GBM invasion, promoted intercellular communication via Connexin 43 upregulation in microglia, and activated peripheral T cells. Transcriptomic analyses of treated patient-derived organoids revealed widespread transcriptional reprogramming, including downregulation of oncogenic long non-coding RNAs (MALAT1, POM121L9), suppression of immune-related pathways, and upregulation of the tumor suppressor LZTS1. Increased histone-associated gene expression suggests chromatin remodeling and induction of a quiescent tumor cell state. Subtype analysis indicated a shift toward a proneural molecular signature. Notably, the antitumoral effects of fadraciclib were preserved in multicellular biomimetic bioprints, whereas nonmalignant astrocytes and microglia were not affected. Therapeutic activity also coincided with altered secretion profiles of extracellular vesicles (EV). EVs from reactive astrocytes contained higher amounts of Fas, which may act as modulator of neuroinflammation.

conclusionCDK2/9 inhibition shows promise as a therapeutic strategy for GBM. Fadraciclib exhibits multifaceted anti-tumor activity and spares nonmalignant cells of the central nervous system, supporting its further development in therapies that target transcriptional and immune pathways, as well as quiescent tumor cell populations.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2GlioblastomaOrganoidsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalHumansPhenotypeTemozolomideCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2TemozolomideDNA damageIntercellular crosstalkLong non-coding RNAMetabolic rewiringMicroglia

Identifiers

PMID42829432
PMCPMC13633624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.