ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
The safety and tolerability of opicapone in elderly Parkinson's disease patients: a real-world, multicenter, retrospective study.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Opicapone (OPC) is an effective add-on medication for motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD), with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Elderly PD patients are a great proportion of the real-world PD population, often underrepresented in clinical trials. This multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study aimed to assess the real-world safety and tolerability of OPC in PD patients aged ≥ 65 years. Clinical-demographic data were collected at OPC initiation (T0) and at the last follow-up visit (T1). OPC-related adverse events (AEs) and reasons for discontinuation were recorded. Patients were compared according to age and treatment continuation. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate association between baseline features and occurrence of AEs and discontinuation. One-hundred and one elderly PD patients were included and followed up for 20.6 ± 18.8 months after OPC initiation. Overall, 49 patients (48.5%) reported AEs, and OPC was discontinued in 29 (28.7%) within 9.4 ± 15.3 months, with neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular/autonomic AEs being the most common reasons. Patients aged ≥ 75 years reported greater disease severity and frequency of AEs compared to younger patients, but similar discontinuation rates at follow-up. At T1, OPC discontinuers exhibited greater motor impairment and a lower total levodopa equivalent dose. Univariate analyses showed that age, disease stage, and comorbidity burden were significantly associated with AEs occurrence. In the multivariable analysis, disease stage remained the only significant baseline feature associated with AEs. OPC was generally well tolerated in this cohort of real-world elderly PD patients. Larger, prospective studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42829398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.