Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829350›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Characterising the 'Genomics Friend': Experiences of learning genomics in the workplace to inform implementation efforts.

Alice Kim, Jennifer Weller-Newton, Louise Keogh, Amy Nisselle

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice KimUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. am.kim@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9874-6166
Jennifer Weller-NewtonUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-8497
Louise KeoghUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2963-6451
Amy NisselleUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-5906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale genomic medicine implementation efforts are presenting relevant and authentic opportunities for the health workforce to learn genomics in the workplace, particularly from genomic expert colleagues or 'champions'. This paper presents novel insights on genomic experts' role and influence on learning genomics from the perspective of physicians not trained in genetics. As part of a study on workplace learning of genomics, longitudinal qualitative datasets were collected in 2021-2023 from ten non-genetics physicians working in hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to characterise participants' perceptions of, and workplace interactions with, genomic experts. Deductive content analysis was then applied to sort and synthesise participants' relationships with genomics experts. Designated the 'Genomics Friend', these individuals are trained in genetics or recognised as same-specialty genomic champions and perceived as trusted and accessible sources of genomic expertise. Participants who had a Genomics Friend leveraged their established relationship on an ad hoc basis to address identified knowledge gaps. Sorting participants into the Genomics Friend Relationship Matrix demonstrated how having a Genomics Friend enhanced genomic workplace learning and practice for physicians across different career stages and specialties. These findings offer insights into how intra- and inter-disciplinary interactions and collegial relationships provide professional development opportunities through workplace learning. Moreover, we consider how genomic expert 'friends' could support implementation efforts by facilitating the health workforce to learn, adopt and practise genomics.

Identifiers

PMID42829350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.