ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Characterising the 'Genomics Friend': Experiences of learning genomics in the workplace to inform implementation efforts.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale genomic medicine implementation efforts are presenting relevant and authentic opportunities for the health workforce to learn genomics in the workplace, particularly from genomic expert colleagues or 'champions'. This paper presents novel insights on genomic experts' role and influence on learning genomics from the perspective of physicians not trained in genetics. As part of a study on workplace learning of genomics, longitudinal qualitative datasets were collected in 2021-2023 from ten non-genetics physicians working in hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to characterise participants' perceptions of, and workplace interactions with, genomic experts. Deductive content analysis was then applied to sort and synthesise participants' relationships with genomics experts. Designated the 'Genomics Friend', these individuals are trained in genetics or recognised as same-specialty genomic champions and perceived as trusted and accessible sources of genomic expertise. Participants who had a Genomics Friend leveraged their established relationship on an ad hoc basis to address identified knowledge gaps. Sorting participants into the Genomics Friend Relationship Matrix demonstrated how having a Genomics Friend enhanced genomic workplace learning and practice for physicians across different career stages and specialties. These findings offer insights into how intra- and inter-disciplinary interactions and collegial relationships provide professional development opportunities through workplace learning. Moreover, we consider how genomic expert 'friends' could support implementation efforts by facilitating the health workforce to learn, adopt and practise genomics.
Identifiers
42829350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.