Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42829289›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health2026

Virtual Doula Support After the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency: Strengths, Limitations, and Adaptations.

Lori Uscher-Pines, Kortney Floyd James, Molly Waymouth, Bridget Basile Ibrahim, Maria DeYoreo, Ateev Mehrotra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lori Uscher-PinesRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic address: luscherp@rand.org.
Kortney Floyd JamesRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Molly WaymouthRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Bridget Basile IbrahimYale School of Nursing, Orange, Connecticut.
Maria DeYoreoRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Ateev MehrotraSchool of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

The Impact of Virtual Doula Services on Birth Outcomes in Rural CommunitiesR01NR018837 · NINR · RAND CORPORATION · PI Lori Uscher-Pines · 2020 to 2026
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR018837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many doulas shifted to a hybrid model, combining virtual and in-person support. Little is known about how doulas have adapted their practices to this new model of support.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 certified birth doulas from 11 U.S. states. Participants provided both in-person and virtual doula support. Interviews incorporated the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions implementation science framework to characterize practice modifications and included critical incident technique questions to elicit comparisons between virtual and in-person care. Interviews occurred from November to December 2025, and transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants identified numerous advantages of virtual doula support for doulas and clients, including convenience, scheduling flexibility, reduced travel burden, accommodation of client preferences, and increased participation of geographically distant family members. Key disadvantages included challenges with rapport-building, lack of physical touch, reduced effectiveness during birth, and inability to provide hands-on postpartum assistance. Some doulas described how they modified their approach to deliver virtual support. Views on the comparability of virtual and in-person visits varied widely and appeared related to doulas' conceptualization of their role. Most participants viewed virtual birth support as somewhat inferior to in-person support, although exceptions were noted.

conclusionsVirtual doula support offers meaningful advantages such as improved access and flexibility but presents certain trade-offs. Doulas expressed different opinions regarding equivalence of in-person and virtual support. There is a need for rigorous comparative effectiveness studies to inform policy and coverage decisions as virtual doula support continues to expand.

Identifiers

PMID42829289
PMCPMC13644851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.