ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Cross-cultural translation and psychometric validation of the Arabic Intermittent Catheterization Adherence Scale (ICAS): a bicentric study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) is the reference treatment for neurogenic and non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction, yet adherence falls over time. The Intermittent Catheterization Adherence Scale (ICAS) measures this adherence, but no Arabic version has existed. We translated the ICAS into Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and tested its psychometric properties in 84 Tunisian adults on CISC at 2 rehabilitation departments. Translation followed forward and back translation guidelines, with a 6-member expert committee and a pretest of 20 patients. We assessed content validity with the content validity index (CVI), structure with exploratory factor analysis (EFA), internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, and 10-day test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The mean total score was 3.12 ± 2.03 on the 0 to 8 scale, with no floor or ceiling effect. Content validity was strong (scale-level CVI by averaging 0.99). The correlation matrix was suitable for factor analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.780; Bartlett p < 0.001). Parallel analysis supported a single factor explaining 40.1% of the variance, on which item 5 loaded weakly (0.25). Internal consistency was acceptable (alpha 0.75) and test-retest reliability excellent (single-measures ICC 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98). Associations with clinical indicators were weak and non-significant. The Arabic ICAS reads best as a single-dimension screening measure for Tunisian patients and needs confirmation in larger, independent Arabic-speaking cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42828725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.