Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828724›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Critical review of artificial intelligence in synthetic biology: DBTL cycle applications, challenges, and design rules for microbial strain engineering.

Amir Razavinia, Abazar Razavinia, Negar Pourghasem, Mirmajid Majidi, Faezeh Khanjanimoghtader, Hosna Hamzavi, Zahra Salehi, Forouzan Shahri, Navid Pourzardosht, Bahman Khalesi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amir RazaviniaDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abazar RazaviniaGenetics Department, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Negar PourghasemDepartment of Chemistry, Farhangian University, Sari, Iran.
Mirmajid MajidiDepartment of Biology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Faezeh KhanjanimoghtaderDepartment of Genetics, East Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Hosna HamzaviDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra SalehiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Forouzan ShahriDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Navid PourzardoshtBiochemistry Department, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Bahman KhalesiDepartment of Research and Production of Poultry Viral Vaccine, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Karaj, 3197619751, Iran.
Zahra Sadat HashemiATMP Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, National Cancer Institute, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. z.hashemi@acecr.ac.ir.
Saeed KhaliliDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. saeed.khalili@modares.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the field of synthetic biology research. This approach has the potential to make the design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle more predictable by improving design prioritization, experimental planning, and data analysis. This review aims to analyze the application of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and language models, across synthetic biology, specifically neural networks for genetic circuit design, protein engineering, metabolic pathway optimization, and multi-omics data analysis. The main focus is to identify how AI tools are applied across the DBTL cycle, from design to final data analysis, and to assess their validation and evidence levels. The reviewed studies indicate that, in specific applications, AI-based methods can reveal patterns and relationships that may be difficult to identify using conventional approaches, while deep learning (DL) and language models can reveal patterns and relationships that may be difficult to identify using conventional approaches. These studies also indicate that AI methods can improve prediction performance and reduce redundant experiments in specific applications. Furthermore, AI can support high-throughput technologies and has potential for genome-scale design. However, important limitations remain, including uncertainty in model behavior, limited data validation and transparency, difficulties in data analysis and interpretation, uncertainty in model predictions, and safety and ethical concerns. Therefore, the safe and widespread adoption of AI technologies in the healthcare, energy, and environmental biotechnology sectors requires the development of stronger regulatory and ethical standards.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSynthetic BiologyDeep LearningGenetic EngineeringMachine LearningMetabolic EngineeringNeural Networks, ComputerSoft ComputingArtificial intelligenceBiofoundriesData analysisDeep learningSynthetic biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.