ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
Critical review of artificial intelligence in synthetic biology: DBTL cycle applications, challenges, and design rules for microbial strain engineering.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the field of synthetic biology research. This approach has the potential to make the design-build-test-learn (DBTL) cycle more predictable by improving design prioritization, experimental planning, and data analysis. This review aims to analyze the application of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and language models, across synthetic biology, specifically neural networks for genetic circuit design, protein engineering, metabolic pathway optimization, and multi-omics data analysis. The main focus is to identify how AI tools are applied across the DBTL cycle, from design to final data analysis, and to assess their validation and evidence levels. The reviewed studies indicate that, in specific applications, AI-based methods can reveal patterns and relationships that may be difficult to identify using conventional approaches, while deep learning (DL) and language models can reveal patterns and relationships that may be difficult to identify using conventional approaches. These studies also indicate that AI methods can improve prediction performance and reduce redundant experiments in specific applications. Furthermore, AI can support high-throughput technologies and has potential for genome-scale design. However, important limitations remain, including uncertainty in model behavior, limited data validation and transparency, difficulties in data analysis and interpretation, uncertainty in model predictions, and safety and ethical concerns. Therefore, the safe and widespread adoption of AI technologies in the healthcare, energy, and environmental biotechnology sectors requires the development of stronger regulatory and ethical standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42828724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.