Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828718›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2026

Integrating Housing and HIV Care: Evaluation of the Implementation and Impact of Three Differentiated Service Delivery Housing Pilots in New York City.

McKaylee Robertson, Yaoyu Zhong, Angela Ghesquiere, John Rojas, Diane Addison, Ellen Wiewel, Sarah Braunstein, Kinsey Dinan, Jacqueline Dudley, Maaz Siddiqui and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

McKaylee RobertsonInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), 55 W. 125th St, New York City, NY, 10027, USA. mckaylee.robertson@sph.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-6572
Yaoyu ZhongNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-1110
Angela GhesquiereNew York City Department of Social Services, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-6790
John RojasNew York City Department of Social Services, New York City, NY, USA.
Diane AddisonInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), 55 W. 125th St, New York City, NY, 10027, USA.
Ellen WiewelNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-0500
Sarah BraunsteinNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9670-4314
Kinsey DinanNew York City Department of Social Services, New York City, NY, USA.
Jacqueline DudleyNew York City Department of Social Services, New York City, NY, USA.
Maaz SiddiquiNew York City Department of Social Services, New York City, NY, USA.
Denis NashInstitute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY), 55 W. 125th St, New York City, NY, 10027, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-5386

Funding

New York City City Council NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) provides housing, benefits, and case management for low-income people with HIV (PWH) in New York City (NYC). HASA implemented three differentiated service delivery (DSD) pilots: Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH), Transitional Supportive Housing (TSH), and Emergency Single Room Occupancy (ESRO), testing tiered case management by housing type. The PSH pilot aimed to maintain viral suppression outcomes with higher caseloads (50:1), while the TSH and ESRO pilots aimed to improve outcomes with lower caseloads (25:1). We merged programmatic data with the NYC HIV Surveillance Registry to compare 6-month viral load suppression (VLS) and 12-month durable viral suppression (DVS) between pilot and non-pilot clients with follow-up through August 2022. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were estimated using log-binomial models. Actual caseload ratios were lower than planned: PSH (36:1), TSH (17:1), and ESRO (24:1, near its 25:1 target) compared with ~ 34:1 in non-pilot arms. VLS rates were higher among pilot clients: PSH (77% vs. 72%; aRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.07), TSH (65% vs. 56%; 1.06, 1.01-1.11), and ESRO (50% vs. 46%; 1.08, 0.99-1.17). DVS showed similar trends: PSH (70% vs. 62%; 1.05, 0.98-1.11), TSH (51% vs. 41%; 1.13, 1.05-1.22), and ESRO (37% vs. 29%; 1.11, 0.88-1.39). Implemented partly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the PSH and TSH pilots met their goals of maintaining or improving VLS and DVS, though lower-than-planned caseload ratios may have influenced outcomes. The ESRO pilot may have improved VLS slightly, but wide confidence intervals due to under-enrollment limit interpretation of DVS effects.

Indexed as

Case managementDifferentiated service deliveryDurable viral suppressionSupportive housingViral suppression

Identifiers

PMID42828718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.