ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Obstetric and thrombotic outcomes among pregnant patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a propensity score matched real-world analysis.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancies complicated by BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with increased maternal and thrombotic risk; however, large real-world comparative data remain limited. We performed a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study using the TriNetX database to evaluate maternal, obstetric, and thrombotic outcomes among pregnant patients with MPN compared with matched non-MPN controls. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and antithrombotic medication use were balanced after matching (standardized mean difference < 0.1). Among 4,467,127 pregnancies, 4,563 patients had MPN, most commonly essential thrombocytosis (85%). Compared with matched controls, MPN pregnancies had significantly higher all-cause mortality (1.1% vs. 0.2%; hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.8), gestational hypertension (11.1% vs. 7.8%; HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5), preeclampsia/eclampsia (10.4% vs. 5.3%; HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-2.1), preterm labor (6.1% vs. 3.7%; HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8), intrauterine growth restriction (7.3% vs. 5.1%; HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), postpartum hemorrhage (5.5% vs. 3.8%; HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), and venous thromboembolism (2.7% vs. 0.7%; HR 3.2, 95% CI 2.2-4.6). Arterial thrombotic events were not significantly different between groups. Pregnancies in patients with MPN are associated with significantly increased maternal, obstetric, and venous thrombotic complications, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management and individualized thromboprophylaxis strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.