ReviewInflammopharmacology2026
Macrophage polarization plasticity in pulmonary fibrosis: a review from pathogenesis to therapeutic targeting.
Review in Inflammopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease characterized by significant extracellular matrix (ECM) accumulation and persistent scarring of lung tissues. Despite improvements in understanding its pathophysiology, effective therapeutic options are limited. Increasing evidence pertains to the critical importance of macrophages, which are major regulators of innate immunity and demonstrate remarkable plasticity that determines PF development. Classically activated M1 macrophages promote pro-inflammatory responses, whereas alternatively activated M2 macrophages facilitate tissue repair and remodelling. In fibrotic lungs, a chronic bias toward M2 phenotypes promotes fibroblast activation, collagen accumulation, and abnormal wound repair. Additionally, macrophage polarization is very dynamic, influenced by cytokines, growth factors, metabolic reprogramming, and epigenetic regulation in the microenvironment. This dynamic flexibility highlights their dual role; protective during acute damage and harmful in chronic fibrosis. Recent research suggests that addressing transcriptional networks and metabolic checkpoints that control macrophage fate can regulate inflammatory and fibrotic responses. Therapeutic approaches targeted at reprogramming macrophages to an M1 phenotype show promise for attenuating or halting fibrotic development. This review underlines the importance of macrophage polarization plasticity in PF, focusing on its dualistic nature and the molecular mechanisms that regulate phenotypic switching. It emphasizes macrophage flexibility as a major area for intervention by combining current insights into macrophage biology with developing treatment approaches, combining innate immune regulation with fibrotic remodelling and highlighting potential strategies to support the restoration of lung homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42828663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.