Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828634›Full record

ArticleOncology and therapy2026

Real-World First-Line Treatment Characteristics and Physician Drivers in Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and without Actionable Genomic Alterations.

Dwight H Owen, Martin Sebastian, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu, Shilpa Viswanathan, Shivani K Mhatre, Inderjit K Dhillon, Cosmina Hogea, Siwen Ding, Cameron Forshaw, Hollie Bailey and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dwight H OwenJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University, 300 W 10 Ave, Columbus, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. dwight.owen@osumc.edu.
Martin SebastianGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Frankfurt, Germany.
Hirotsugu KenmotsuShizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shilpa ViswanathanGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
Shivani K MhatreGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
Inderjit K DhillonGilead Sciences Europe, Stockley Park, UK.
Cosmina HogeaGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
Siwen DingGilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA, USA.
Cameron ForshawAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Hollie BaileyAdelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Delvys Rodríguez-AbreuHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) and with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥ 50%, first-line (1L) treatment options include immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy or IO with chemotherapy. However, real-world data describing treatment patterns, physician decision-making, and patient-reported disease burden remain limited.

methodsThis observational, cross-sectional study used data from the Adelphi Real World Lung Cancer Disease Specific Programme™, conducted between December 2023 and May 2024 in Asia, Europe, and the USA. Physicians completed surveys on adults with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs, who received or were receiving 1L therapy. Treatment patterns, physician-reported reasons for treatment selection, symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were descriptively analyzed by 1L regimen (IO monotherapy, IO + chemotherapy).

resultsOverall, 257 physicians reported data for 511 patients; 148 patients completed PRO questionnaires. Most patients received 1L IO monotherapy (n = 340, 67%), while 23% received IO + chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy was the most frequently prescribed regimen across regions. Physicians most commonly cited overall survival and response-related benefits as reasons for 1L treatment selection; quality of life was less frequently prioritized. Both physician- and patient-reported symptoms were common at data collection, including fatigue, cough, and dyspnea. Nearly half of patients required caregiver support. Health-related quality of life, assessed using EQ-5D-5L and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) instruments, indicated that among patients treated for more than 90 days, substantial disease burden was present across 1L treatment groups.

conclusionsIn real-world clinical practice, two-thirds of patients with aNSCLC, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and no AGAs received 1L IO monotherapy, driven primarily by perceived survival benefits on part of physicians. Considerable symptom burden, functional impairment, and caregiver dependence were observed across the 1L treatment groups evaluated. These findings highlight ongoing unmet needs and underscore the importance of incorporating patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life considerations into 1L treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Advanced non–small cell lung cancerDisease burdenFirst-line treatmentImmunotherapyPatient-reported outcomesPD-L1 highReal-world evidenceTreatment patterns

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.