Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828623›Full record

ReviewInfection2026

30-day mortality and antifungal resistance in confirmed Candida auris bloodstream infections (BSI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Muhammad Kamran, Muhammad Ali, Afreenish Amir, Naseer Ali Shah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad KamranDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Government College Women University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. kamranahmdani@gmail.com.
Muhammad AliDepartment of Pharmacy, The University of Chenab, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
Afreenish AmirDepartment of Microbiology, National Institute of Health (NIH), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Naseer Ali ShahDepartment of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan. drnaseer@comsats.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida auris is a potentially multidrug-resistant nosocomial fungus that was classified as a WHO critical priority pathogen in 2022. Individual cohort studies report 30-day bloodstream infection mortality; however, prior meta-analyses have not restricted their primary pool to confirmed bloodstream infection cases.

methodsA PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted (CRD420261418844). Studies enrolling patients with confirmed C. auris bloodstream infection and reporting 30-day or in-hospital all-cause mortality were included. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects modelling was applied to all proportion pools. Fluconazole and amphotericin B resistance were combined. Echinocandin resistance was synthesised narratively because of the zero-event problem. Subgroup analyses were pre-specified by geographic region and study designs.

resultsSixteen studies (N = 1,069 patients; 2016-2026) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled 30-day mortality from 13 studies (N = 813) was 39.6% (95% CI 32.4-47.0%; I

conclusionsConfirmed C. auris bloodstream infections have a pooled 30-day mortality rate of approximately 40%, along with near-universal fluconazole resistance. Echinocandins remain the first-line therapy, although mortality rates remain high. Susceptibility-guided therapy and enhanced infection control are essential.

Indexed as

30-day mortalityAmphotericin BBloodstream infectionCandida aurisCandidemiaEchinocandinFluconazole resistanceMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.