ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
An in-depth review on antimicrobial efficacy of melittin in vivo.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The past couple of decades have witnessed growing interest in the therapeutic potential of melittin, the main peptide constituent of honeybee venom. Given the rapid growth of in vivo studies investigating the antimicrobial efficacy of melittin and the absence of a thorough review devoted to this subject, a critical evaluation of the literature has become both necessary and opportune. This review commences with a brief overview of the structural characteristics and biological properties of melittin, followed by an evaluation of the in vivo evidence supporting its antibacterial, antifungal, antiprotozoal, and antiviral activities. The limitations of the available studies are also considered, and future research priorities are identified to guide the continued development and clinical translation of this multifunctional peptide. Evidence indicates that melittin can reduce microbial burdens in selected experimental infection models and modulate inflammatory responses. However, the magnitude and nature of these effects vary according to the pathogen, infection model, host context, administration route, dose, and formulation. The continued development of melittin as a therapeutic candidate will require a multidisciplinary strategy. Further efforts should be made to develop biocompatible delivery platforms, including inorganic nanomaterials, polymeric carriers, lipid-based systems, and hydrogels. Additionally, combination therapies with conventional antimicrobial agents or other antimicrobial peptides should be explored. Overall, melittin represents a promising anti-infective candidate, although further studies are required to define its therapeutic window, pharmacokinetic and biodistribution profiles, long-term safety, immunogenicity, and appropriate delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42828604What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.