ReviewCVIR endovascular2026
Transarterial embolization in musculoskeletal care: an indication-stratified narrative review.
Review in CVIR endovascular, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransarterial embolization (TAE) is increasingly used across a broad spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, ranging from established hemostatic and tumor-related indications to emerging pain-directed procedures for degenerative joint disease and chronic inflammatory tendinopathies. Because these applications differ substantially in clinical maturity, methodological quality, durability of outcomes, and comparative evidence, an indication-stratified synthesis is needed. MAIN BODY: This narrative review summarizes technical principles, vascular anatomy considerations, embolic agent selection, clinical indications, and evidence maturity in musculoskeletal TAE. Hemostatic and selected tumor-related applications are established components of multidisciplinary care, whereas pain-directed embolization, including Genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis and embolization for tendinopathies, is generally performed as a stand-alone minimally invasive procedure targeting pathological neovascularity. Current evidence remains heterogeneous, with variable study designs, follow-up, endpoints, and definitions of technical and clinical success.
conclusionsMusculoskeletal TAE is an expanding field with established, intermediate, and exploratory indications. Its evidence base is strongest for hemostatic and selected tumor-related applications, whereas stand-alone pain-directed embolization requires careful patient selection, standardized outcome assessment, and further comparative trials to define durability and clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.